The Monte and Libby (2018) proposed the paragraph-by-paragraph “sales pitch.” First is the introductory paragraph, identifying the problem through a high-level literature review and presenting the statement regarding the literature gap. The second paragraph offers a solution in the form of the project and the unique team. Preliminary data supporting the team’s work is incorporated here. Next the specific aims are presented, outlining the objectives to meet the needs that have been established. Some rules of the aims themselves are to ensure that each is independent and that no new concepts are introduced. Every concept of the aims should have been mentioned thus far in the text. The last paragraph adds innovation, significance, and greater application.
The real challenge is that it must be concise. There is a famous expression, attributed to Mark Twain: “If I had more time, I would have written a shorter letter.” This statement reminds all of us that writing in an effective and concise manner is quite challenging and time-consuming. Most aims pages are edited heavily, evolving as the proposal takes shape and thoughts become clearer.
The specific aims page is the most important page of any proposal. It can also be used as a “calling card” to begin a discussion about a specific project. In today’s clinical world, where everyone faces so much information and demand for attention, a well-developed specific aims page will summarize the research and provide a point of discussion for those you ask for advice or collaboration. Instead of trying to state all the ideas regarding significance, aims, and methods, sending and sharing a specific aims page can help to focus the discussion.
Goldstein, A.M., Balaji, S., Ghaferi, A.A., Gosain, A., Maggard-Gibbons, M., Zuckerbraun, B., & Keswani, S.G. (2021). An algorithmic approach to an impactful specific aims page. Surgery, 169(4), 816–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2020.06.014
Monte, A.A., & Libby, A.M. (2018). Introduction to the specific aims page of a grant proposal. Academic Emergency Medicine, 25(9), 1042–1047. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13419
Scholarship Spotlight:
In a research brief in the July 2025 issue of the Oncology Nursing Forum, lead author Amy Caramore, BSN, RN, CEN, a nurse leader at Memorial Sloane Kettering, and colleagues illustrated a project that adds to the literature regarding financial toxicity in cancer. Caramore and her team queried RNs, advanced practice providers, and ancillary staff to assess their understanding of their patients’ financial toxicity, their role in mitigating it, and any training they may have received regarding financial toxicity. The interesting findings of this work were that oncology staff are sensitive to financial toxicity and would like to have further training to support their patients.
The findings are a call to action for all institutions and professional organizations to provide frontline caregivers with information for cost-of-care discussions, risk factors, and strategies to help patients. Grassroots efforts like the one led by Caramore take clinical questions and identify the real-world needs and gaps in care. These are the essential connections for nurse scientists to generate new research ideas.
Caramore and Oncology Nursing Forum Editor Janine Overcash, PhD, APRN-CNP, FAANP, FAAN, in ONS Voice.
Caramore, A., Sharma, B., O'Leary, J., Aviki, E.M., & Thom, B. (2025). Cancer care affordability and the healthcare team: Expanding an assessment of clinical perceptions and attitudes in nursing. Oncology Nursing Forum, 52(4), 259-264. https://doi.org/10.1188/25.ONF.259-264